Amparo

SERVICES

The Amparo proceeding is a constitutional control mechanism aimed at protecting human rights from acts of any authority that violate them.

Historically known as the "writ of guarantees," it remains the highest form of protection against governmental actions that may infringe upon fundamental rights.

AMAPARO

Primary objective

The primary objective is to safeguard human rights and constitutional guarantees, uphold the Constitution, and oversee the actions of authorities.

Grounds for:

CLASSIFICATION

Types of Amparo Trials

There are two types of Amparo proceedings Direct Amparo and Indirect Amparo.

Additionally, there is another constitutional defense mechanism known as the Action of Unconstitutionality, which Ling Aretz can assist with, helping authorities and representatives defend certain rights under the Constitution.

Direct Amparo

Direct Amparo is a constitutional control mechanism applicable to final rulings, awards, and resolutions that conclude a trial or proceeding.

Grounds for:

Final judgments.
Awards.
Resolutions that terminate a trial.
Resolutions that, without deciding the main issue, bring the trial to an end.

Indirect Amparo

Indirect Amparo applies to acts or omissions by authorities that are not final judgments, awards, or resolutions ending a trial but that directly affect individuals and their rights.

Grounds for:

Laws.
International treaties.
Regulations.
Decrees.
Acts or omissions by authorities other than judicial, administrative, or labor tribunals.
Actions during proceedings causing irreparable harm.
Actions outside a trial or after its conclusion.
Actions affecting third parties not involved in the trial.
Any governmental action threatening life, liberty, rights, property, or possessions.

Action of Unconstitutionality

The Action of Unconstitutionality is a constitutional control mechanism to address potential conflicts between general norms (laws, international treaties, regulations) and the Mexican Constitution.

Eligible Parties for Filing:

33% of members of the Chamber of Deputies.
33% of members of the Senate.
The Federal Executive through the Legal Advisor.
Registered political parties (for electoral matters).
The National Human Rights Commission.
State human rights protection bodies.
The National Institute for Transparency and Access to Information (INAI).
The Attorney General of the Republic.

SUPPORTING TRAJECTORY

More than 15 years of experience

Since 2008, at Ling Aretz we have built a solid track record combining in-depth knowledge of business law with a strategic and personalized approach to each client.

Our experience ranges from conflict prevention to defense in complex litigation, ensuring effective and sustainable solutions.

Thanks to the Ling Aretz team, our company was able to prevent legal conflicts that were previously unavoidable. Their advice on regulatory compliance has given us the peace of mind to operate safely and efficiently.

When faced with complicated litigation, the knowledge and experience of Ling Aretz attorneys made the difference. Not only did they solve the case, but they also guided us to avoid similar situations in the future.

Its comprehensive approach to prevention and litigation has been invaluable to our company. Since working with them, we have reduced legal costs and improved our internal policies.

CONTACT US

We are here to help you

This site is protected by Google reCAPTCHA and Privacy Policies and Terms of Service apply.

SERVICES

Amparo

AMAPARO

Grounds for:

CLASSIFICATION

SUPPORTING TRAJECTORY

CONTACT US

Linkedin

Facebook

Instagram

Threads

Twitter

Whatsapp

Quick menu

Services

Address